Legal Opinion
Jones v. Union Bank of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 11, 2005No. B173302PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, P. J.
A lender successfully defends an action to set aside a foreclosure sale. Here we hold the antideficiency provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 580d do not prohibit an award of attorney fees. In addition, Civil Code sections 2924c and 2924d do not limit the amount of fees the court may award. We affirm.
FACTS
In June of 1988, Peppertree Corporate Business Park and three other entities borrowed $8,700,000 from the predecessor of Union Bank of California (hereafter Bank). The loan was personally guaranteed by Jerve M. and Alice Jones and Gilbert and Evelyn Dreyfuss.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Xuereb v. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Arntz Contracting Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Sears v. BaccaglioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Passanisi v. Merit-McBride Realtors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Ripley v. PappadopoulosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Loeffler v. MedinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- 612 SOUTH LLC v. Laconic Limited PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- In re Relativity Fashion, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Aquino v. Klein CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Elation Systems, Inc. v. Fenn Bridge LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.