In re Relativity Fashion, LLC
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING MOTION FOR AWARDS OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES AGAINST NETFLIX, INC.
MICHAEL E. WILES, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE '
Relativity (defined below) and Mr. Ryan Kavanaugh have filed a motion seeking reimbursement of attorneys’ fees and expenses they incurred during litigation against Netflix, Inc. [Docket No. 1963]. The litigation resulted in an Order and Injunction [Docket No. 1932] that was issued for the reasons set forth in a written bench decision dated June 1, 2016. [Docket No. 1948]. The Court holds that Relativity is entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Billybey Marina Services, LLC v. Bouchard Transportation Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Greenlight Capital, Inc. v. James FishbackDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- LAMONICA v. TiltonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Manmohan Uttarwar v. Lazard Asset Management LLC, et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Roth v. PlikaytisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.