Ellington v. Pacific Coast Pulp & Paper Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
This action was begun to collect the sum of $2,000, based upon two promissory notes executed and delivered by the defendant to the appellant. One note was for the sum of $1,000, and one note for the sum of $1,040. While the notes sued upon are dated, respectively, September 21, 1931, and October 10, 1931, the record shows that they are renewal notes. The first notes issued by the defendant and delivered to the plaintiff appear to have been delivered on February 21, 1931, and on April 10, 1931. The dates of the renewal notes, which were subsequently merged into the notes dated September 21,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pollak v. StauntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Domenigoni v. Imperial Live Stock & Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Teachout v. BogyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Michell v. Grass Valley Gold Mines Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Walker v. Harbor Realty & Development Corp.California Supreme Court · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Doria v. International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- SECURITY FIRST NAT. BANK OF LA v. RospawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Gursey v. Campus Camera Shop, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1950
- Mifflin v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936