Legal Opinion

Miller v. SAIF Corp. (In re Miller)

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 25, 2018No. A160311PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.

*75Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board concluding *767that his shoulder condition is compensable as an occupational disease and not also as an accidental injury. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the board's finding that claimant's shoulder condition developed gradually and, therefore, that the board did not err by analyzing compensability using only an occupational-disease analysis. Accordingly, we affirm.

We review the board's order for substantial evidence and legal error, ORS 656.298(7) ; ORS 183.482(8), and for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. DiBrito v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Smirnoff v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Luton v. Willamette Valley Rehabilitation CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Benz v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Simi v. LTI Inc. - Lynden Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API