Legal Opinion

Benz v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 27, 2000No. WCB No. 98-04562; CA A105703PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.

Claimant seeks reversal of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board upholding SAIF’s denial of his occupational disease claim for bilateral hearing loss. Claimant asserts that the Board erred by reaching its own medical conclusion that occupational exposure to noise was not the major contributing cause of his hearing loss and that substantial evidence in the record does not support the Board’s conclusion. We reverse and remand to the Board for further consideration.

Claimant has worked as an electrician for approximately 40 years. In 1987, he began working for employer Blazer Industries.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Runft v. Saif Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Roseburg Forest Products v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. SAIF Corp. v. CalderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Compensation of HunterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. SAIF Corp. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. SAIF Corp. v. DurantCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Spurger v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. SAIF Corp. v. DeMarcoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API