Kincaid v. Pitney Bowes, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
TURNAGE, Judge.
Robert M. Kincaid brought this suit for damages for failure to supply a service letter, pursuant to § 290.140, RSMo 1978. The trial court entered summary judgment for Pitney Bowes on the issues of whether Kincaid could be entitled to actual or punitive damages. Kincaid appeals, arguing: (1) that there was a material question of fact as to whether he suffered actual damages; and (2) that the trial court erred in holding that Pitney Bowes issued Kincaid a service letter, which holding precluded an award to Kincaid of punitive damages.
Reversed and remanded on the issue of actual…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vaughan v. Taft Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Herberholt v. dePaul Community Health CenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
- Rotermund v. Basic Materials Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Comerio v. Beatrice Foods Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1984
- Wuerderman v. J. O. Lively Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sam J. Brooks v. Woodline Motor Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Ball v. American Greetings Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Uhle v. Sachs ElectricMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Grasle v. Jenny Craig Weight Loss Centres, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1996