Legal Opinion

Kincaid v. Pitney Bowes, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 5, 1988No. WD 38878PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TURNAGE, Judge.

Robert M. Kincaid brought this suit for damages for failure to supply a service letter, pursuant to § 290.140, RSMo 1978. The trial court entered summary judgment for Pitney Bowes on the issues of whether Kincaid could be entitled to actual or punitive damages. Kincaid appeals, arguing: (1) that there was a material question of fact as to whether he suffered actual damages; and (2) that the trial court erred in holding that Pitney Bowes issued Kincaid a service letter, which holding precluded an award to Kincaid of punitive damages.

Reversed and remanded on the issue of actual…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vaughan v. Taft Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  2. Herberholt v. dePaul Community Health CenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  3. Rotermund v. Basic Materials Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Comerio v. Beatrice Foods Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1984
  5. Wuerderman v. J. O. Lively Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sam J. Brooks v. Woodline Motor Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  2. Ball v. American Greetings Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Uhle v. Sachs ElectricMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Grasle v. Jenny Craig Weight Loss Centres, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API