Legal Opinion

Herberholt v. dePaul Community Health Center

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 8, 1981No. 62628PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Per curiam

Pursuant to Rule 83.02, the Eastern District of the Court of Appeals transferred the within cause to this Court that it might consider, again, the constitutionality of the so-called “service letter statute” (§ 290.140, RSMo 1978).1

The appeal by plaintiff, now appellant, is from the trial court’s entry of a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative a new trial in an action for noncompliance with § 290.140 (Count I) and directed verdicts in actions for libel (Count II) and slander (Count III).

Appellant is a graduate electrical engineer with several years experience. On January…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Tietjens v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Abernathy v. Sisters of St. Mary'sSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. State Ex Rel. St. Joseph Belt Railway Co. v. ShainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  4. Baumle v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. Hogue v. WurdackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Overcast v. Billings Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  2. Linda Jasperson, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Purolator Courier Corp., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  3. Boyle v. Vista Eyewear, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Blue v. Harrah's North Kansas City, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Oaksmith v. BrusichAlaska Supreme Court · 1989

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API