Legal Opinion
General Teamsters Union, Local No. 406 v. Uptown Cleaners & Hatters, Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 5, 1959No. Docket 58, Calendar 47,430PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*208Edwards, J.
We believe tbe issues presented by this record are:(1) Is plaintiff the representative of a majority of the 9 driver-salesmen employed by defendants?'(2) Did the chancellor have power, under tho agreement between the parties and the terms of the-labor mediation act (CL 1948 and CLS 1956, § 423.1 et seq. [Stat Ann 1950 Rev § 17.454(1) et seq.]), to require defendants to enter into collective bargaining with plaintiff?
Certain features of this case make our task somewhat easier than it might otherwise be. First, we have here a purely intrastate problem with no question of pre-emption…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- National Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- International Association of MacHinists Tool and Die Makers Lodge No. 35 v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Franks Bros. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Local No. 1644 v. Oakwood Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
- St Clair County Education Ass'n v. St Clair County Intermediate School DistrictMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- United Skilled Maintenance Trades Employees of the Board of Education v. Pontiac Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Hospital Employees' Division of Local 79 v. Flint Osteopathic HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- General Teamsters Union, Local No. 406 v. Uptown Cleaners & Hatters, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.