Legal Opinion

Daniels Gardens, Inc. v. Hilyard

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided November 20, 1946PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Vice-Chancellor:

This court is required to determine whether the defendants have violated certain restrictive covenants contained in the deeds to their properties.

*338We are here concerned with two cases which were consolidated for purposes of the final hearing. The complainant in each case is Daniels Gardens, Inc., which originally owned all of a war housing development containing about 350 dwellings located near Wilmington and known as “Elsmere Manor.” A great many of these dwellings have been sold by complainant, but it still owns and rents a substantial number.

Among the properties sold…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hooker v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  2. Baumert v. . MalkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Clark v. JammesNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Carr v. RileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  5. Gibson v. MainSupreme Court of Delaware · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nash v. ConnellCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
  2. New Castle County v. Pike Creek Recreational Services, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
  3. Alliegro v. Home Owners of Edgewood Hills, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1956
  4. Alliegro v. Home Owners of Edgewood HillsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1956
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API