Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 22, 1993PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, Justice.

In this appeal from the Court of Chancery, we address the question of whether a grantee in a private conveyance of land bounded by, or abutting on, a railroad right of way is presumed to take a fee simple title to the centerline of the railroad with the right to claim such title in the event the right of way is abandoned. In dismissing the underlying action, the Court of Chancery ruled that the rule announced in du-Pont v. American Life Insurance Company, Del.Ch., 187 A.2d 421 (1963), which applied such a presumption to land abutting an alleyway, should not be extended to land…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. WeedTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Roeder Co. v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Rohner v. NiemannSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  4. Hudson Farms, Inc. v. McGrellisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  5. Cuneo v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rowley v. Massachusetts Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  2. Foundation for Preservation of Historic Georgetown v. ArnoldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Ex Parte JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. Asmussen v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  5. State ex rel. Alabama State Port Authority v. Mobile River Terminal Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API