Legal Opinion
Nash v. Connell
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided August 18, 1953PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
99 A.2d 242 (1953)
NASH et ux.
v.
CONNELL et al.
Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle.
August 18, 1953.
Howard M. Berg (of Melson & O'Hora), Wilmington, for plaintiffs.
Leonard G. Hagner, Wilmington, for defendants.
BRAMHALL, Vice Chancellor.
Plaintiffs have moved under Rule 56(c) for judgment against defendants, alleging that defendants have failed to state a legal defense to plaintiffs' complaint and that there is no triable issue set up by the pleading as to any material fact.
The complaint of plaintiffs alleges that the plaintiffs are the legal owners of three lots in a subdivision of land at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wittlin v. GiacaloneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
- Russell Realty Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Daniels Gardens, Inc. v. HilyardCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1946
- White v. HansenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Hartman v. WolvertonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Fleer Corp. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Irwin & Leighton, Inc. v. W.M. Anderson Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1987
- Harman v. Masoneilan International, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- Lewis v. FuquaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1985
- Mann v. Oppenheimer & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.