Legal Opinion

Strong v. Hancock

California Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1927No. Docket No. L.A. 8555PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The following opinion, prepared by Mr. Justice Richards, is hereby adopted as the opinion of the court:

This action was originally instituted by W. A. Strong, the owner of a certain lot in a certain tract of land known as "Shatto Place” in the city of Los Angeles, against one Clara E. Shatto, the original owner of the entire tract and grantor of said specific lot to a predecessor of said plaintiff, the object "of said action being that of having the title of said plaintiff to said lot quieted as against certain restrictions and conditions subsequent contained in said deed to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Trustees of Columbia College v. . ThacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Jackson v. StevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  3. Landell v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  4. Evans v. FossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. Martin v. HolmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Hurd v. AlbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Marra v. Aetna Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Johnstone v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Hess v. Country Club ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Bethea v. LockhartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API