Legal Opinion

Martin v. Holm

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1925No. Docket No. L.A. 7724PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to establish and impose a general plan of building restrictions upon certain lots owned in fee by the defendants, who are the children, and heirs and grantees, of the original owners of a subdivided tract of land, and who are erecting buildings for business purposes in an alleged strictly residential tract. Trial was had before the court sitting without a jury, and the parties entered into a written stipulation by which the essential facts are agreed upon. Judgment was entered for the defendants, and plaintiffs prosecute this appeal.

In 1904 Ferdinand and Emma…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Allen v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. McBride v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Lamb v. WahlenmaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Berryman v. Hotel Savoy CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Todhunter v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Zaragosa v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Wing v. Forest Lawn Cemetery Assn.California Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Marra v. Aetna Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Citizens for Covenant Compliance v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API