Martin v. Holm
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.
Plaintiffs brought this action to establish and impose a general plan of building restrictions upon certain lots owned in fee by the defendants, who are the children, and heirs and grantees, of the original owners of a subdivided tract of land, and who are erecting buildings for business purposes in an alleged strictly residential tract. Trial was had before the court sitting without a jury, and the parties entered into a written stipulation by which the essential facts are agreed upon. Judgment was entered for the defendants, and plaintiffs prosecute this appeal.
In 1904 Ferdinand and Emma…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Allen v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- McBride v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Lamb v. WahlenmaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Berryman v. Hotel Savoy CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Todhunter v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Zaragosa v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Wing v. Forest Lawn Cemetery Assn.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Marra v. Aetna Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Citizens for Covenant Compliance v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.