Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Peterson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 11, 1985No. 13817-1-IPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Scholfield, A.C.J.

— Discretionary review was granted in this case in which Mark S. Peterson seeks to reverse a decision of the Superior Court affirming his conviction in Seattle Municipal Court for exceeding the posted speed limit. Peterson contends that radar evidence was improperly admitted. We agree and reverse.

On March 1, 1982, at 6:30 p.m., Officer Thomas Byers of the Seattle Police Department was parked on 27th Avenue N.E. and was using a CMI radar unit to check the speeds of vehicles on N.E. 95th Street. Peterson's vehicle approached 27th Avenue N.E. in an eastbound direction on N.E.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. State v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State v. CanadayWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State Ex Rel. Humiston v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State v. WooWashington Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. BashawWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. BashawWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Protect the Peninsula's Future v. City of Port AngelesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. State v. NewbernCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  5. City of Bellevue v. HellenthalWashington Supreme Court · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API