State ex rel. Ventrone v. Birkel
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This court will not reverse the decision of the court below in a contempt proceeding in the absence of a showing of an abuse of discretion. See Cady v. Cleveland Worsted Mills Co. (1933), 126 Ohio St. 171. The Court of Appeals determined that appellees were not in contempt of prior court orders.
No evidence has been adduced to demonstrate an abuse of discretion by the Court of Appeals in not finding appellees in contempt. Therefore, that decision will not be disturbed.1
Appellants also raise the issue of the refusal of the Court of Appeals to make separate findings of fact and conclusions of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cady v. Cleveland Worsted Mills Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by94 opinions
- Denovchek v. Board of Trumbull County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Celebrezze v. GibbsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Planned Parenthood Asss'n v. Project JerichoOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Vanguard Transportation Systems, Inc. v. Edwards Transfer & Storage Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2013
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.