Legal Opinion

Planned Parenthood Asss'n v. Project Jericho

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1990No. Nos. 89-579 and 89-592PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtH. Brown, J.

We must determine whether the trial court abused its discretion by finding appellants in contempt for violating the injunction under either Civ. R. 65(D) or Civ. R. 23. We hold that the trial court properly exercised the discretion it had pursuant to both Civ. R. 65(D) and Civ. R. 23.

I

First Amendment Considerations

The First Amendment guarantees the right to publicly communicate views and to express dissension. Demonstrators may speak, march, picket, leaflet, carry signs or otherwise act to inform or persuade others of their beliefs. These rights, however, do not include the right to imperil…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Arnold v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hamilton v. Ohio Savings BankOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Celebrezze v. GibbsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Midland Steel Products Co. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local 486Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Baughman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2000

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API