Cady v. Cleveland Worsted Mills Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
There is no debatable constitutional question involved in this case. No such question was pre seated in the appellate conrt; nor do plaintiffs in error, in their brief, make any snch claim in this conrt; on the other hand the plaintiffs in error claim their right to file the case here for the reason that it originated in the Court of Appeals; and this is the only question, other than one of fact, -which is presented upon the motion of defendant in error to dismiss the petition in error.
Section 2, Article IV, of the State Constitution, confers upon this court appellate jurisdiction “in cases…
2Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. Celebrezze v. GibbsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Ventrone v. BirkelOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State ex rel. Delco Moraine Division v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Stern Furniture Co. v. SternOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Cianciola v. Johnson's Island Property Owners Assn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.