Legal Opinion

Denovchek v. Board of Trumbull County Commissioners

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1988No. 87-508PublishedCited by 136 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtH. Brown, J.

The first issue to be decided is whether appellant has a right to appeal the lower court’s dismissal of the contempt charge. Since we find that he does not have a right to appeal, we do not reach the other issues raised by the parties.

I

R.C. 2705.09 gives a right of appeal to a person found to be in contempt of court. It provides:

“The judgment and orders of a court or officer made in cases of contempt may be reviewed on appeal. Appeal proceedings shall not suspend execution of the order or judgment until the person in contempt files a bond * * (Emphasis added.)

The assumption underlying the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Brown v. Executive 200, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. TimsonOhio Supreme Court · 1974

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by136 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Corn v. RussoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State ex rel. Bitter v. MissigOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In Re PurolaOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Toledo v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2013

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API