State v. Harris
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
Sentenced as an habitual offender, defendant appeals. We discuss: (1) jurisdiction to impose the enhanced sentence; (2) initiation of the habitual offender proceedings; (3) validity of the prior convictions; (4) propriety of the enhanced sentence under the New Mexico statutes; and (5) constitutional validity of the enhanced sentence.
Jurisdiction
Jury verdicts on June 23, 1982, found defendant guilty of two counts of burglary and two counts of larceny. A supplemental information was filed on July 26, 1982, charging defendant as an habitual offender. The trial court sentence…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hutto v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. SegottaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. MondragonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. DuarteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. BachichaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. TellesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.