Legal Opinion

Stardust, Inc., a Corporation, and Anthony Cornero Stralla v. Securities and Exchange Commission

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 29, 1955No. 14818PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Chief Judge.

Petitioners seek our order to set aside an order of the Securities and Exchange Commission “that an investigation be made to determine whether Stardust, Inc., and Anthony Cornero Stralla have engaged in the acts and practices set forth in Section II” of that order. Section II is as follows:

“Members of its Staff have reported information to the Commission which tends to show that:
“A. During the period from about June 7, 1954 to the present, Stardust, Inc., and Anthony Cornero Stralla have offered, sold and delivered, or caused to be delivered, after sale, certain…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. HirschSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Petroleum Exploration, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. R. A. Holman & Co., Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  2. M. G. Davis & Co. v. CohenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  3. Las Vegas Hawaiian Development Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API