Legal Opinion

M. G. Davis & Co. v. Cohen

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 24, 1966No. 66 Civ. 799PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN, District Judge:

This is an action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1361 and 2201 for a declaratory judgment and relief in the nature of mandamus. Plaintiffs are presently respondents in two administrative proceedings now pending before the Securities and Exchange Commission. They have moved in this court for a preliminary injunction restraining the members of the S.E.C. from conducting these proceedings. Rule 65, F.R.Civ.P. Defendants have cross-moved for a summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P.

Plaintiff M. G. Davis & Co., Inc. (Davis & Co.) is a New…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Boire v. Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Medical Committee for Human Rights v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  2. Associated Press v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  3. Harris v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Allegheny Airlines, Inc. v. FowlerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Republic National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API