Legal Opinion

Mathis v. City of Tulsa

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 14, 1953No. A-11787PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, P. J.

In this case H. L. Mathis was charged in the municipal criminal court of the city of Tulsa with the unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquor. Defendant first demanded a jury trial, and thereafter when he was about to be forced to trial, waived a jury.

Three days prior to the case coming on for trial defendant filed a motion to suppress the evidence, claiming an unlawful search and seizure. When the case was called for trial, the attorney representing the city stated:

“It is the position of the City in this ease that this motion to suppress comes too late. This case was set on the jury…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crim v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. McCarthy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Dawson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MarketIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957
  3. Cates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API