Legal Opinion
State v. Market
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 22, 1973No. 1-673A106A, 1-673A107 to 1-673A113, 1-573A101 and 1-573A102PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHoffman, C. J.
The State of Indiana by Malcolm H. Auker-man, Prosecuting Attorney, 47th Judicial Circuit, Vermillion County, is appealing the trial court’s sustaining of motions to quash indictments on various grounds. The State of Indiana, by Theodore L. Sendak, Attorney General of Indiana, intervening on behalf of himself and the State of Indiana, moved this court to dismiss the appeals for the reason that the Attorney General had not appeared for the State. Defendant-appellees adopted the brief of the Attorney General in support of his motion to dismiss the appeals.
The sole issue raised is: Does the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Bradley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Morss v. ForbesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Adams v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1947
- State ex rel. Young v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- People ex rel. Hoyne v. NewcomerIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Arnold v. SendakDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1976
- State of Indiana v. Tammy Sue HarperIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Spalding v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Office of State's Attorney Ex Rel. Sheehan v. DiamondSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- Brune v. MarshallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.