Legal Opinion

Kolberg v. Sherwin-Williams Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 23, 1928No. Docket No. 6324PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

Plaintiff sued for damages for loss and injury sustained by him from the use upon his orange orchard of a product manufactured and sold by the defendant known as “Citro-mulsion” and used for the purpose of spraying orange and other citrus trees to destroy scale. Plaintiff had judgment for $6,100, from which the defendant has appealed on a bill of exceptions.

The manufactured article was sold by the agents of defendant to the plaintiff through a dealer under an agreement that the dealer would apply the spray to plaintiff’s orange trees under the direction and control of defendant’s agents. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Shearer v. Park Nursery Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Tracy v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Wilson v. SheaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  5. Albion Lumber Company v. LowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Kalash v. Los Angeles Ladder Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Corprew v. Geigy Chemical CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. BaridonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  5. Ebers v. General Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API