United States v. Fairchild
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JAMES, Judge:
This case illustrates the waste of appellate resources caused by inadequate records. Staff Sergeant Fairchild pleaded guilty to using and possessing cocaine and using and distributing methamphetamine, all between 1 October 1988 and 31 March 1989.1 Appellate defense counsel argue that the court-martial lacked personal jurisdiction over the appellant because the offenses occurred during a prior enlistment. The charge sheet and personal data sheet, submitted by the government during sentencing, show that the appellant’s prior enlistment ended on 30 November 1989…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Runkle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- United States Ex Rel. Hirshberg v. CookeSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. ClardyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. WheelerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
- United States v. JonesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. BellettU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. ClarkU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992