Legal Opinion

United States v. Fairchild

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided November 20, 1991No. ACM 28892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

JAMES, Judge:

This case illustrates the waste of appellate resources caused by inadequate records. Staff Sergeant Fairchild pleaded guilty to using and possessing cocaine and using and distributing methamphetamine, all between 1 October 1988 and 31 March 1989.1 Appellate defense counsel argue that the court-martial lacked personal jurisdiction over the appellant because the offenses occurred during a prior enlistment. The charge sheet and personal data sheet, submitted by the government during sentencing, show that the appellant’s prior enlistment ended on 30 November 1989…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Runkle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. United States Ex Rel. Hirshberg v. CookeSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. United States v. ClardyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. WheelerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  5. United States v. JonesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. BellettU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  2. United States v. ClarkU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API