Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Hirshberg v. Cooke

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 28, 1949No. 231PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

This case raises important questions concerning the statutory jurisdiction of general courts-martial of the Navy.

In 1942 the petitioner was serving a second enlistment in the Navy. Upon the surrender of the United States forces on Corregidor petitioner became a war prisoner of Japan. After liberation in September, 1945, petitioner was brought back to the United States and hospitalized. He was restored to duty in January, 1946. March 26, 1946, he was granted an honorable discharge because of expiration of his prior enlistment. The next day he re-enlisted, obligating himself to serve four years…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Ex Parte MilliganSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Ex Parte ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Runkle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Duncan v. KahanamokuSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Toth v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Hiatt v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Humphrey v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. J. W. Schwartz, Individually and as Commanding General of the United States Army, Letterman General Hospital v. Napoleon CovingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API