Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Sioux Steel Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1991No. 17091PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WUEST, Justice.

On September 14, 1987, Kevin A. Goodman (Goodman) was seriously injured while working at Sioux Steel Company (Sioux Steel) in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Goodman was an employee of Manpower, Inc. (Manpower), a labor service company, and had been assigned to temporary duty at Sioux Steel. Goodman received workers’ compensation benefits through Manpower’s Insurer.

Goodman also brought a common law negligence action against Sioux Steel for his injuries. Sioux Steel responded by arguing that Goodman’s claim was barred by SDCL 62-3-2, the workers’ compensation exclusivity provision.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. Safway Steel Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Novenson v. Spokane Culvert & Fabricating Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Danek v. Meldrum Manufacturing & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Fox v. Contract Beverage Packers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. South Dakota Medical Service, Inc. v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Harn v. Continental Lumber Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Petersen v. US Reduction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. Petersen v. U.S. Reduction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. Ghersi v. SalazarUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Canal Insurance Co. v. AbrahamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API