Legal Opinion

Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1963No. L. A. 27313PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C.J.

Allen Roberson, while employed at Fidler’s Manufacturing Co., Inc., sustained an injury to his left hand which caused permanent disability of 40 per cent, for which he received normal workmen’s compensation benefits. He had a previous permanent disability which, added to his industrial injury, resulted in a permanent disability rating of 60% per cent. Since the combined effect was a permanent disability of less than 70 per cent, Roberson was not eligible for benefits from the Subsequent Injuries Fund. The Industrial Accident Commission awarded Roberson $130 for medical costs incurred in his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clements v. T. R. Bechtel Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Busick v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Longshore v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Stolldorf v. StolldorfWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Beverly Hills Multispecialty Group, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Siofletea v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API