Safe Flight Instrument Corp. v. Sundstrand Data Control Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROTH, District Judge.
Plaintiff Safe Flight Instrument Corporation (Safe Flight) claims defendant Sundst-rand Data Control (Sundstrand) has been and still is infringing Safe Flight’s patents for wind shear detection systems. At this early stage of the litigation, Sundstrand moves this Court to enter a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(7) to govern discovery. Safe Flight contests the motion. At issue is not what confidential materials are to be disclosed but rather to whom such disclosures will be made. While Sundstrand would (under appropriate…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- U.S. Steel Corporation v. The United States and U.S. International Trade Commission, and Cosipa, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Local 342, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. TRW, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Akzo N. V. v. United States International Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Shreveport, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1985
- Giulio Natta, Piero Pino and Georgio Mazzanti, Ex Rel. Interference 89,634 v. Alex Zletz and Standard Oil Company of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Sega Enterprises Ltd., a Japanese Corporation v. Accolade, Inc., a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Nutratech, Inc. v. Syntech (SSPF) International, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2007
- Layne Christensen Co. v. Purolite Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2010
- Northbrook Digital, LLC v. Vendio Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Sioux Pharm, Inc. and Sioux Biochemical, Inc. v. Eagle Laboratories, Inc. Bio-Kinetics Corporation And Dana SummersSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.