Legal Opinion

Pond v. Simpson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 24, 1925PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

This is a suit in equity by the plaintiff against the defendant Simpson, both residents of Maine, alleging a debt due from Simpson to the plaintiff and seeking to reach and apply in payment of that debt (1) a promissory note made by the defendants Smeeton and Haddon to the order of Simpson, now overdue, and (2) shares of stock in the defendant corporation owned by Simpson.

No personal service was made upon Simpson. The service by registered mail was insufficient to bring him in as a party and subject him to the jurisdiction of the court. •Simpson has not appeared generally. He appeared…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Reynolds v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Cheshire National Bank v. JaynesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Rollins v. Bay View Auto Parts Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Warr v. Collector of TaxesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Boyle v. Building Inspector of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  2. Rosenthal v. MaletzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  3. Weinberg v. BrotherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. D. J. Doyle & Co., Pty. Ltd. v. DardenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  5. Mosher v. MosherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API