Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 19, 1916PublishedCited by 57 opinions

Bill in equity, filed in the Superior Court on September 3,1915, against the Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railway Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Kansas and alleged to have a usual place of business in Boston, the American Express Company, a joint stock association organized under the laws of the State of New York and having a usual place of business in Boston, and the Western Union Telegraph Company, a corporation organized under the laws of…

Read the full summary

Bill in equity, filed in the Superior Court on September 3,1915, against the Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railway Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Kansas and alleged to have a usual place of business in Boston, the American Express Company, a joint stock association organized under the laws of the State of New York and having a usual place of business in Boston, and the Western Union Telegraph Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of New York and having a usual place of business in Boston, alleging that the plaintiff is the bearer and holder…

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

The question at issue in this-case is the jurisdictional one, whether service of process has been made upon the defendant railway company, who hereafter will be referred to as the defendant.

The facts are these. The Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railway Company is a corporation organized under the laws of Kansas. Its lines of railroad are located in Missouri, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, and perhaps in other States, but none in Massachusetts. In 1912, it entered into an agreement whereby George E. Marsters, a resident within this Commonwealth, was to represent its railway system as New England…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Davis v. Farmers Co-Operative Equity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Pulson v. American Rolling Mill Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
  4. Amherst-Pelham Regional School Committee v. Department of EducationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Kerr v. PalmieriMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API