Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. Maletz

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 8, 1948PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

This bill in equity by the holder of certain promissory notes, of which the defendant Tuller is the *588maker, the defendant Reuben Maletz is the payee, and the defendants Reuben and Frances Maletz are indorsers, seeks to reach and apply in payment of the notes the interest of the defendants Maletz in certain policies of insurance issued by the defendant New York Life Insurance Company on the life of the defendant Reuben Maletz and by bim assigned to the defendant Frances Maletz. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 214, § 3 (7). The bill, as amended, alleges that the defendant Tuller is a resident of Brookline;…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Freeman v. AldersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Pennington v. Fourth National Bank of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Security Savings Bank v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gulda v. Second National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  2. Boyle v. Building Inspector of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  3. Wood v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Sadler v. Industrial Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  5. Hiller v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API