MacHado v. Borges
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The defendants appeal from the judgment. The findings disclose this state of facts: On May 1, 1907, the defendant Borges for a good and sufficient consideration made and delivered to the plaintiff his four promissory notes. Nothing has been paid on said notes and the sum of two thousand six hundred and forty dollars is due plaintiff for principal and interest thereon. On April 20, 1911, Borges obtained a judgment against plaintiff for $945.07 and costs. This judgment was on April 24, 1911, assigned by Borges to defendant Gabriel, his attorney, to secure Gabriel for attorney’s fees and costs…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Haskins v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Hobbs v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Russel v. ConwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Porter v. LiscomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by13 opinions
- Harrison v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Downey v. HumphreysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Saunders v. New Capital for Small Businesses, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Erlich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Arp v. BlakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.