Legal Opinion

Carrier v. Lindquist

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 2001No. 990836PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

T1 This case arises from a dispute between homeowners about whether a private easement exists in an alley between the homeowners' respective properties. Plaintiffs Seott, Hilary, and Barbara Carrier jointly own property abutting the south side of the alley, and plaintiff Sherman W. Clow owns property next to the Carriers' property, also abutting the south side of the alley. Defendants A. Kent Lindquist and Trina Clayton jointly own a lot abutting the north side of the alley. Claiming ownership over the northern half of the alley, defendants extended their landscaping to that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. System Concepts, Inc. v. DixonUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Papanikolas Bros. Enterprises v. Sugarhouse Shopping Center AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  4. City of San Antonio v. OlivaresTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  5. North Union Canal Company v. NewellUtah Supreme Court · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. HorneUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Johnson v. Hermes Associates, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Roberts v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  4. South Ridge Homeowners' Ass'n v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  5. Carter v. DONECourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API