Legal Opinion
Roquemore v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided January 13, 2000No. 01-96-00019-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
DAVIE WILSON, Justice.
We grant the State’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our previous opinion, and substitute the following. We deny appellant’s motion for rehearing.
Howard Earl Roquemore, Jr., a juvenile, appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery. A jury found him guilty as an adult and assessed punishment at 11 years in prison. Appellant contends the trial court erred (1) in trying him as an adult without proper waiver of an examining trial and (2) in refusing to suppress his oral confession and all the fruits thereof. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant was charged with the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Roquemore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- in the Matter of E.M.R., a Juvenile, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
- In re J.D.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- State v. Simpson, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2000
- Roquemore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.