Legal Opinion
Roquemore v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided November 14, 2001No. 722-00PublishedCited by 141 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · PricePrice, J.
in which MEYERS, JOHNSON, HOLCOMB, and COCHRAN, J.J., joined and in Part II-A of which WOMACK, J., joined.
Family Code section 52.02(a) requires that once an officer takes a juvenile into custody, the officer must do one of six enumerated acts without unnecessary delay and without first taking the juvenile to any place other than a juvenile processing office. Article 38.23 of the Code of Criminal Procedure requires the suppression of evidence if section 52.02(a) is not followed. The officers in this case obtained a confession and recovered stolen property after taking the appellant into…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. BallardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by141 opinions
- Sierra v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Pham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Wehrenberg, Michael FredCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Porter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
- Hitchcock v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.