Legal Opinion
Gillet v. King
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 8, 1996No. Civil Action 94-1619PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
Before the Court are defendants’ motion to dismiss, plaintiffs opposition thereto, and defendants’ reply. 1 A plaintiffs factual allegations must he presumed true and liberally construed in Ms favor when reviewing the adequacy of a complaint for purposes of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion. Phillips v. Bureau of Prisons, 691 F.2d 966, 968 (D.C.Cir.1979) (citing Miree v. DeKalb County, Georgia, 433 U.S. 25, 27 n. 2, 97 S.Ct. 2490, 2492 n. 2, 53 L.Ed.2d 557 (1977)). In addition, plaintiff must be given every favorable inference that may be drawn from his…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Rattigan v. GonzalesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Franklin v. PotterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Wiley v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Dudley v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Adams v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.