Legal Opinion

Waltimyer v. Smith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 4, 1989No. 155PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

Romaine Smith appeals from an order determining that Dennis and Barbara Waltimyer owned a right-of-way by prescription as to the driveway located along the property between the parties’ residential lots. We affirm the order of the trial court.

The relevant facts as found by the trial court may be summarized as follows. In 1937, Ervin and Clyde Eckert, brothers, owned two adjacent lots and decided to construct a driveway between them with approximately half of the driveway located on each lot. They used the entire driveway in common.

In July of 1947, Clyde Eckert transferred title…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dark v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
  2. Union Canal Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1836
  3. Walley v. IracaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Pierce v. CloudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
  5. Dunlap v. LarkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Sutton v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Soderberg v. WeiselSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. McNAUGHTON PROPERTIES, LP v. BarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Brennan v. Manchester Crossings, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Glenn v. ShueySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API