Legal Opinion

State ex rel. City of Ada v. Williamson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 22, 1949No. 34105PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

This action presents the question whether the Attorney General should be required in mandamus to approve certain so-called public utility bonds of the city of Ada, Okla.

Respondent had declined or refused to approve the bonds on two grounds: (1) That the expenditure purpose did not constitute a public utility within the meaning of section 27, art. 10 of the Constitution of Oklahoma, and (2) that the contemplated improvement *548when constructed with the bond money would not be owned exclusively by the city as required by further provision of said section of the Constitution.

The construction o r…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Coleman v. FrameSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Dingman v. City of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Hooper v. State Ex Rel. ClineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. State Ex Rel. City of Shawnee v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Hood v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Shawnee v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  2. Jones v. LorenzenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. State Ex Rel. City of Pauls Valley v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API