State ex rel. City of Ada v. Williamson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
This action presents the question whether the Attorney General should be required in mandamus to approve certain so-called public utility bonds of the city of Ada, Okla.
Respondent had declined or refused to approve the bonds on two grounds: (1) That the expenditure purpose did not constitute a public utility within the meaning of section 27, art. 10 of the Constitution of Oklahoma, and (2) that the contemplated improvement *548when constructed with the bond money would not be owned exclusively by the city as required by further provision of said section of the Constitution.
The construction o r…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coleman v. FrameSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Dingman v. City of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Hooper v. State Ex Rel. ClineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- State Ex Rel. City of Shawnee v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Hood v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Shawnee v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Jones v. LorenzenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- State Ex Rel. City of Pauls Valley v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950