Legal Opinion
Stacey Dyer v. Tina Hornbeck
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 6, 2013No. 10-15044PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge SACK; Concurrence by Judge M. SMITH.
OPINION
SACK, Senior Circuit Judge:
The petitioner-appellant, Stacey Daniella Dyer, appeals from the judgment entered on December 15, 2009, in United States District Court for the Eastern District of California (Oliver W. Wanger, Judge) denying her 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Dyer contends that the California Court of Appeal unreasonably applied clearly established Supreme Court precedent when it affirmed the trial court’s decision to admit as evidence statements made by Dyer during a station-house interview. She…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Scott Clabourne v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Manuel Nevarez v. Ron BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. LundinDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- James McKinney v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- State v. QuigleyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.