Legal Opinion
Hidden Oaks Limited, Hidden Oaks Limited, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. The City of Austin, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 27, 1998No. 96-50837PublishedCited by 209 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:
Hidden Oaks Limited (“Hidden Oaks”) and the City of Austin (the “City”) cross-appeal the district court’s entry of judgment for Hidden Oaks on claims of breach of contract and procedural due-process, its dismissal of Hidden Oaks’ substantive due process and takings claim's, and its award of $115,000 in attorney’s fees to Hidden Oaks. We affirm in part, reverse and vacate in part, and remand.
I
Hidden Oaks owns Stoneridge Apartments (“Stoneridge”), ah eight-building, 137-unit complex located in Austin, Texas. In August 1994, the City served on Hidden Oaks eight…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by209 opinions
- Guy v. Crown Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Bowlby v. City of Aberdeen, Miss.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Charles W. Warren Ruth Warren v. City of Athens, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Rutherford v. Harris County TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Perry Hamburger, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
204 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.