Legal Opinion

Millers Mutual Fire Insurance v. Ed Bailey, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1982No. 13857PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

I

This is a declaratory judgment action brought to determine whether plaintiff-respondent Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Texas, Inc., [Millers] under the terms of a policy it issued to defendant-appellant Ed Bailey, Inc., [Bailey] is required to defend or indemnify Bailey, in a suit brought by third parties against Bailey. The parties stipulated to the following facts.

On June 1, 1974, Millers issued a comprehensive general liability policy to Bailey’s predecessor in interest, B & G Urethane, Inc. The policy ran from June 1, 1974 to June 1, 1975. The pertinent…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hogan v. Midland National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Shields v. Morton Chemical CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Gruol Construction Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  4. Bartholomew v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1980
  5. Travelers Ins. Co. v. CJ Gayfer's & Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Don's Building Supply, Inc. v. Onebeacon Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. United Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Frontier Ins. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
  4. United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1986
  5. Dorchester Development Corp. v. Safeco Insurance, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API