Higinbotham v. Frock
Oregon Supreme Court
From Sherman: William L. Bradshaw, Judge. Suit by Maggie Higinbotham and husband against Henry and Bertha Frock, resulting in a decree for defendants, from which plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bean
This is a suit to cancel and annul a bond for a deed. On December 20, 1902, the defendant Henry Frock purchased of the plaintiffs 160 acres of land in Sherman County for $2,500. He paid $1,200 in cash, giving his three promissory notes for the balance, due the 1st day of October, 1903, 1904 and 1905, respectively. Each note bore interest at 8 per cent, payable annually, and provided that, if the interest was not so paid, the whole sum, both principal and interest, should become immediately due and collectible at the option of the holder of the note. At the same time the plaintiffs executed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Flanagan Estate v. Great Cent. Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Sievers v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1899
- Security Savings Co. v. MackenzieOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- O'Connor v. HughesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Burkhart v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1886
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Grider v. TurnbowOregon Supreme Court · 1939
- Epplett v. Empire Inv. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921
- County of Lincoln v. FISCHEROregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Blondell v. BeamOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Stockmen's Supply Co. v. JenneIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.