Legal Opinion

Silfvast v. Asplund

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1933No. 7,005PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

Appeal by Ester Asplund and John Sundberg, as administrator of the estate of 0. W. Asplund, deceased, from a judgment quieting title in the plaintiff, Aino Silfvast, to certain land in Jefferson county, which judgment was entered against 0. W. Asplund and Ester Asplund during the lifetime of the former.

On May 31, 1928, Mrs. Aino Lundgren, now Silfvast, desired to dispose of a dairy farm, formerly operated by her husband, Armas Lundgren, then deceased. 0. W. Asplund and his wife Ester were seeking such a place; the parties were brought together and a contract for the sale and purchase of the…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Higgins v. . EagletonNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Cleary v. FolgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Cowdery v. GreenleeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Suburban Homes Co. v. NorthMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Adams v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bethurem v. HammettWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Sjoberg v. KravikMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. J. M. Hamilton Co. v. BattsonMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Silfvast v. AsplundMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Stark v. BornerMontana Supreme Court · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API