Legal Opinion
East Coast Novelty Co., Inc. v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 17, 1992No. 90 Civ. 2108 (RWS)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants City of New York (the “City”), Frank Biehler (“Inspector Biehler”), Karen Pakstis (“Officer Pakstis”), Mitchell Kolpan (“Detective Kolpan”), Robert Viteretti (“ADA Viteretti”), Robert Morgenthau (the “District Attorney”), and Michael Walsh (“Lieutenant Walsh”) (collectively the “Defendants”) have all moved for an order dismissing Plaintiff East Coast Novelty Company’s (“East Coast”) Amended Complaint, pursuant to Rule 12(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., or granting summary judgment against East Coast’s claims, pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P.
For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Feerick v. SudolnikDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Covington v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Robinson v. City and County of DenverDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1999
- East Coast Novelty Co., Inc. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Kaul v. StephanDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.