Legal Opinion

East Coast Novelty Co., Inc. v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 25, 1994No. 90 Civ. 2108 (RWS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiff East Coast Novelty Company (“East Coast”) has moved in limine for an order precluding Defendants City of New York (the “City”), Frank Biehler (“Inspector Biehler”), and Mitchell Kolpan (“Detective Kolpan”) (collectively the “Defendants”) from introducing at trial any evidence, testimony or reference primarily concerning: (1) the prior arrests or convictions of East Coast’s principals; (2) references to “organized crime,” “La Cosa Nostra,” or “the Mafia”; and (3) the invocation of the Fifth Amendment privileges during the respective depositions of Louis…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Daniel v. American Board of Emergency MedicineDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
  2. L.B. v. Town of ChesterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  3. Lippe v. Bairnco Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  4. Osan Ltd. v. ACCENTURE LLPDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
  5. Wagschal v. Sea Ins. Co., Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API