Ballen Friedman v. Bank of Kremlin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Superior Court, Garfi,eld Gouniy; Dan Tlueli, Judge. Action by Bailen & Friedman against the Bank of Kremlin. From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the petition, ■ plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROSSER, C.
This was an action by Mike Bai-len and Dave Friedman, a partnership composed of Bailen & Friedman, against the Bank of Kremlin. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the plaintiffs’ petition, and they have appealed. The petition alleges, in substance, that the defendant is indebted to plaintiffs upon two checks dated July 16, 1910; that the checks were drawn by Frank Lowery, one payable to the order of George Reihm, and the other to the order of Joe Fleming; that on the 18th day of July, 1910, the checks were offered by their holder to plaintiffs as a cash item; that the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Risley v. . Phenix Bank of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. First National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
- Duncan v. . BerlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- First Nat. Bank of Durant v. School Dist. No. 4Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Izzo v. LudingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Keller v. Frederickstown Savings InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
- Bell-Wayland Co. v. Bank of SugdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Hanna v. McCroryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
- Huffman v. Farmers' Nat. Bank of Cross PlainsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Bank of Jefferson v. First Nat. Bank of MedfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.