Legal Opinion
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. First National Bank
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided June 16, 1904PublishedCited by 24 opinions
Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of the city of Alexandria in an action of assumpsit, wherein the plaintiff in error was the plaintiff, and the defendant in error was the defendant.
1Opinion of the Court
Keith, P.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
The plaintiff in error brought its action of trespass on the case in assumpsit in the Circuit Court of the city of Alexandria against the First Rational Bank of Alexandria. The declaration contains numerous counts, the last of which embraces the ordinary money counts in assumpsit, and the others are special counts, identical in form with that given below, except as to names, dates, and amounts:
“The plaintiff complains of the First Rational Bank of Alexandria, Va., defendant, which has been duly summoned to answer the plaintiff in this action, of a…
2Cited by24 opinions
- Wisner v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Volpe v. Fleet National BankSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
- Leach v. Mechanics Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- State Bank of Chicago v. Mid-City Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- Kentucky Title Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. DunavanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.