Legal Opinion
Parham v. Municipal Court, City of Sioux Falls
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 13, 1972No. File 10982PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANSON, Presiding Judge.
Petitioner, Roger Parham, is charged with the offense of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of Sioux Falls Municipal Ordinance 13.160. He entered a plea of not guilty in Municipal Court and requested trial by jury. His request was denied. His application for the allowance of an intermediate appeal from such order was denied by this court. Likewise, petitioner's application for a Writ of Prohibition to restrain the Municipal Court from proceeding to trial without a jury was denied by the Circuit Court. Petitioner now appeals from the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Waller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Callan v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Baker v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Philip Landry v. Judge J. Robert Hoepfner and William Guste, Jr., Attorney General, State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Blanton v. North Las Vegas Municipal CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. BuckinghamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- United States v. WoodsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.