Legal Opinion

Baker v. City of Fairbanks

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1970No. 1141PublishedCited by 205 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONNOR, Justice.

This case raises important questions about the right to jury trial for certain city ordinance violations. This necessarily means that we must reconsider the rationale of the opinion in Knudsen v. City of Anchorage, 358 P.2d 375 (Alaska 1960), which held that a person charged with a violation of a city ordinance prohibiting reckless driving was not entitled to a jury trial. Since Knudsen was decided, the United States Supreme Court in Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 88 S.Ct. 1444, 20 L.Ed.2d 491 (1968), has made applicable to the states, through the Fourteenth Amendment due…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by205 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Whitton v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State v. GlassAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

200 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API